| Data Set |
PubMed ID |
Cancer Type |
Array Type |
Groups (Number of Samples) |
Number of Probes |
Number of Regions |
CGHpower |
| Chin et al. |
17925008 |
breast |
spotted oligo |
ER+ (113) vs. ER- (57) |
26,755 |
223 |
Output |
| Douglas et al. |
15256451 |
colorectal |
BAC |
MSI (7) vs. CIN (30) |
3,032 |
142 |
Output |
| Fridlyand et al. |
16620391 |
breast |
BAC |
TP53+ (10) vs. TP53- (52) |
1,877 |
231 |
Output |
| Myllykangas et al. |
18506690 |
gastric |
cDNA |
diffuse (15) vs. intestinal (23) |
11,342 |
260 |
Output |
| Nymark et al. |
16740712 |
lung |
cDNA |
asbestos-exposed (11) vs. non-exposed (9) |
10,953 |
242 |
Output |
| Postma et al. |
19150955 |
colorectal |
spotted oligo |
good (16) vs. bad response (16) |
26,755 |
111 |
Output |
| Smeets et al. |
16314836 |
head and neck |
BAC |
HPV+ (12) vs. HPV- (12) |
4,196 |
143 |
Output |
| Wrage et al. |
19208797 |
lung |
spotted oligo |
BM+ (13) vs. BM- (15) |
25,549 |
23 |
Output |
| Simulation 0 |
|
|
in-situ oligo |
(15) vs. (15) |
42,331 |
440 |
Output |
| Simulation 1 |
|
|
in-situ oligo |
(15) vs. (15) |
42,331 |
462 |
Output |
| Simulation 2 |
|
|
in-situ oligo |
(15) vs. (15) |
42,331 |
457 |
Output |
| Simulation 3 |
|
|
in-situ oligo |
(15) vs. (15) |
42,331 |
461 |
Output |
| Simulation 4 |
|
|
in-situ oligo |
(15) vs. (15) |
42,331 |
492 |
Output |
| Simulation 5 |
|
|
in-situ oligo |
(15) vs. (15) |
42,331 |
489 |
Output |
| Simulation 6 |
|
|
in-situ oligo |
(15) vs. (15) |
42,331 |
501 |
Output |
| Simulation 7 |
|
|
in-situ oligo |
(15) vs. (15) |
42,331 |
501 |
Output |
| Simulation 8 |
|
|
in-situ oligo |
(15) vs. (15) |
42,331 |
490 |
Output |
| Simulation 9 |
|
|
in-situ oligo |
(15) vs. (15) |
42,331 |
507 |
Output |
| Simulation 10 |
|
|
in-situ oligo |
(15) vs. (15) |
42,331 |
525 |
Output |
ER = estrogen receptor, MSI = microsatellite instability, CIN = chromosomal instability, HPV = human papilloma virus, BM = bone marrow metastasis